China’s strategic efforts in innovation are paying off, according to a new report.
Applicants asked to develop new products or services to harness the power of “big data” to improve health.
In addition to dreaming about the potential ubiquity of their innovations, innovators can now dream about end poverty through the prosperity their new markets will generate. The Prosperity Paradox by Dillon, Christensen, and Ojomo, offers a blueprint for innovators who want to change the world.
All of this testing is just the first real step in trying to re-open the economy. But what will it take.
By looking mainly at the big picture, we are missing the reality of inequality — and a chance to level the playing field.
The flaws in the competition-is-good-for-you logic
For more than two and a half decades, the Chinese economy grew at average annual rates of 10 per cent. Students of economics standing by and plotting the curves and the global and political intersections would know that at that rate of amassing new...
THERE are some government initiatives that really deserve recognition for smart strategy and transparent implementation.
Responding to innovation or be the innovator? Which has presents the greatest risk?
Isn't copying just the same as innovating? No? Oh.
The spirit of regulation is to establish fairness and openness, which encourages better participation among innovators and users.
There's no denying that a big chunk of the economy feels pretty screwed up right now for millions of working-class
Do we kill elderly people or do we kill the economy?
GDP, the value of a country’s goods and services, is outdated, which is why economists are devising replacements.
There is some evidence that shrinking populations are bad for the global economy. To me, however, the greater tragedy would be a failure to take full advantage of the planet’s capacity to sustain human life, writes columnist Tyler Cowen.